The Babadook

the-babadook-posterThe monster inside us is often the scariest of all. What are we capable of if pushed to the edge? What demons are we harboring? And can we ever escape?

Jennifer Kent’s “The Babadook” is one of the best horror movies in a decade. The monster at its center is a personal demon, not quite a literal one. The thrills and scares come early and often, but the monster itself remains dormant beneath a veil of family drama and psychological turmoil.

Amelia (Essie Davis) is the single-mother to her 7-year-old son Samuel (Noah Wiseman), a precocious young boy but one who finds it hard to be around other children. He doesn’t see monsters, but he believes in them more than the usual child, to the point that he creates makeshift weapons to stop would-be intruders and takes up the defensive immediately for those who would insult or harm his mother. It gets him into trouble, both at school and with his aunt, who no longer wants to be around Samuel and his habits.

Amelia is suffering through a job at an old folks home and is struggling to find a new school for Samuel once his antics get him dismissed. At the same time, she has a recurring dream of her husband’s death in a car crash, who died on the day Samuel was born no less.

All these problems begin to burrow deeper under Amelia’s skin after Samuel finds a sinister looking children’s book called “The Babadook”. There’s a long history of horror movies summoning monsters by reading the pages of an old, ancient book, poem, or diary, but Kent has a visual style that doesn’t linger on the rhyming words and mantras so many other films default to.

Kent’s style is aural editing, with each cut punctuated by each noise, creak, or flourish that seem to resound inside Amelia’s head like a migraine. “The Babadook” is gray and flush of color, but as Amelia’s stress grows more weary, Kent finds a way to sap it of additional light, even going as far as to bend the proportions of their English cottage to surreal angles. There’s a scene at a birthday party in which Kent frames Amelia opposite five leering housewives in a domineering arc. Who are the real monsters and villains of this story?

Perhaps most fascinating is how Kent allows us to get inside Amelia’s head. There are moments of relief for her, like when she takes off work and finds a moment of solace while eating an ice cream cone. The shot is luminous and a dreamy moment of escapism, all before we come crashing down to reality. Kent even toys with our sense of reality, particularly in a scene where Amelia scrambles to patch a hole filled with cockroaches, only to find when guests arrive that the hole was never there.

How do fear, guilt, and frustration with the many nuisances and challenges in our lives begin to mount? “The Babadook” is terrifying for sure, but it’s a drama of depression first, and how when all these stresses come together in a perfect storm, it can be self-destructive.

Essie Davis above all leads Amelia’s mental breakdown and transformation. It’s a jaw-dropping performance that escalates to enormous volumes in the film’s climax. Davis becomes so dangerous and so unpredictable so organically that we hardly see it coming. Her decline and her anger seem so natural, despite how quickly monstrous her actions become, and it’s truly scary.

The film’s ending is perhaps the most polarizing aspect, but it’s a perfect one. “You’ll never get rid of The Babadook”, the book taunts. For Amelia, she’s coping with the grief of losing her husband, even seven years removed from the accident. That pain never goes away, but you have to feed those demons to tame them, and they can overcome you when things get bad.

Most dramas are hardly this perceptive of human nature, let alone indie horror movies. “The Babadook” is so unsettling because it’s so familiar, and it spawns a fear you can’t erase.

4 stars



Add yours →

  1. well, umm, actually i think IT FOLLOWS–which i remember your liking pretty well, brian–is the stronger film, at least in terms of imaginative liberties and technical invention on a far more sprawling canvas * from my point of view, the “psychology” of BABADOOK reeks of the college text, a schematic, step-by-step excursion along a predetermined arc with the mark of academia on it, both in terms of its content and its overly careful (or do i mean anal retentive?) visual design: maybe everyone else was scared, but i mostly found it aggravating–“c’mon mommy, do something sensible for a change!” * by contrast IT FOLLOWS seems more than a little intoxicated with its own possibilities, visual as well as situational, which–arguably–is something we always like to see in films * not to get down on BABADOOK too much: it’s, well, “nice,” a professional calling card–but maybe that’s the problem


    • Much as I like It Follows, I think the more literal interpretation of the monster, or maybe its more traditional horror movie beats, made me think it’s just second best to this one. I see your point about The Babadook’s psychology, but I think it’s much more organic than you do. I’ve been frustrated by movies that seem to beat you over the head with their themes, and I don’t think this is one of them. I think the kind of ambiguous, polarizing ending is good proof of that.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: